Search for: "Shank" Results 1 - 20 of 595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2010, 3:26 am by By DEALBOOK
Shanks Group fell the most in nine years in London trading after saying talks with a fund managed by Washington, D.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:44 pm by Andrew Babb
The impact was severe and paramedics were called to take Shanks to a hospital. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
It is common ground that, as between Professor Shanks and CRL, the rights to any inventions created by Professor Shanks belonged to CRL according to section 39(1) of the 1977 Act. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:25 am
Colworth House, Unilever's Research and Development Facility Author  Lecomte99   Copyright waived by the author   Source Wikipedia Colworth House Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Kitchin) Shanks v Unilever Plc  [2019] UKSC 45 (23 Oct 2019) Nowadays most commercially successful inventions in the United Kingdom are made by [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:23 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Mobley, the Fourth Circuit was forced to decide whether an inmate who was caught with a shank in... [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Daimeon Shanks (University of California, Berkeley) has posted The Ideological Functions of Ecocide on SSRN. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 6:20 am by Neil Wilkof
Shanks, better known as the Dead Sea Scrolls case, will enjoy permanent tenancy. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:02 am
She absolutely shanked her penalty kick. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:15 am
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 354 "The words 'that person' in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 referred to a notional non-connected counterparty operating in the appropriate market at the appropriate time. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:42 am by sally
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1283; [2010] WLR (D) 300 “‘That person’ in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 meant the actual assignee with its actual attributes rather than a notional non-connected counterparty operating in the appropriate market at the appropriate time. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
" However, he was the cell's only occupant and the shank's placement "was such that no one could have placed the shank in the robe without entering the cell. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am by Peter Groves
The answer turns out to be a pracgmatic one - although Professor Shanks OBE FRS FREng (as the judgment calls him) worked for a small cog in the Unilever machine, it was right to consider the benefit to Unilever rather than strictly to his employer. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am by Arnie Clarke
Shanks was employed to invent and, in making the invention, did what he was employed to do. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:16 am
Determining the relevant undertaking was unusually complicated in the case of Professor Shanks: Professor Shanks had been employed by a small research-focused subsidiary of Unilever (CRL), but it was Unilever as a whole that reaped the benefits of Professor Shanks' invention. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by The Editor , CMS
Furthermore, Arnold J indicated that, had it been necessary for him to calculate a fair share of the benefit for Professor Shanks, he would have awarded just 3% of the benefit to Professor Shanks. [read post]
2 May 2021, 12:21 am by Immigration Prof
Entrance Fees: Self-Funded Agencies and the Economization of Immigration by Daimeon Shanks This article examines the financing structure of the U.S. [read post]